Government tax
administrators routinely exceed their authority to seize property. The
Internal Revenue Code specifically outlines WHO is authorized to seize
property, WHAT property is actually subject to seizure, and HOW to
proceed with a seizure.
Section 7321 if the IRS Code describes what property the IRS is
authorized to seize. It States:
"Any property subject to forfeiture may
be seized by the government"
Note that the authorization is limited, and applies only to the
property subject to forfeiture. Now isn't that interesting! The reader
should immediately ask the question: what property is subject to
forfeiture, and what property is not?
Sections 7301 through 7304 of the IRS Code will answer this question.
It places limitations on the IRS by authorizing the seizure of certain
specific items only. The "property subject to forfeiture" is limited to
articles such as those that are subject to the tax on alcohol, tobacco,
and firearms, the raw materials and equipment used to manufacture them,
packaging materials, and vehicles used to transport them. The few other
articles include counterfeit stamps, fraudulent bonds, fraudulent
permits, etc. You should immediately notice that in each case the only
things subject to forfeiture are related to items on which an excise tax
is imposed. The IRS is NOT AUTHORIZED to seize ANYTHING else.
BUT THEY DO!
The Board of Tax Appeals shall be continued as an
independent agency in the Executive Branch of the Government, and shall
be known as the Tax Court.
The name was changed to deceive the public and cause them to think it
was part of the judicial branch of government, when in fact it was not.
Judge's however, both civil and Federal can and do with a stroke of a
pen seize assets anywhere they can find them. In fact they do the
seizures before any court date, or before you are noticed. In other
words, before you are served or sued your bank account is gone along
with any and all assets you own.
The Patriot Act I and II.
Since the patriot act was authorized, you rights and your prosperity
are highly at risk.
I will order the sale of the property.
To understand the legal trickery behind this statement one has only
to ask the question: when will you order it to be sold? The judge
knowingly used future tense. He did not say "I hereby order" or "I am
ordering". He said "I will order" which means that at some time in the
future he may order, or he may not, depending on whether that issue is
ever brought before him. The judge knew full well the effect that such a
statement was intended to have on the individual. It was a veiled threat
designed to scare him into paying up voluntarily, or else.
It could be said that fear and ignorance are the worst enemies you
can have, don't be stampeded by it. Even if the revenuers, and those
conspiring with them, after proper notification from you hold a shame
sale of your property, don't give it up -- attack with a proper court
action. Know your constitutional rights, and don't voluntarily give them
up. Obtain a copy of the laws regarding income tax, and take time to
study the pertinent sections so that you can't be misled
|